Crabtree v. Board of Parole

321 Or. App. 781
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 14, 2022
DocketA177151
StatusUnpublished

This text of 321 Or. App. 781 (Crabtree v. Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crabtree v. Board of Parole, 321 Or. App. 781 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

Submitted August 5, affirmed September 14, petition for review denied December 15, 2022 (370 Or 602)

Shawn Andrew CRABTREE, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision A177151

Shawn Andrew Crabtree filed the briefs pro se. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Erica L. Herb, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Powers, Judge, and Hellman, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Haynes, 168 Or App 565, 7 P3d 623, rev den, 331 Or 283 (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Haynes
7 P.3d 623 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
321 Or. App. 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crabtree-v-board-of-parole-orctapp-2022.