Cpc International Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant

Federal Circuit

Cpc International Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant

31 F.3d 1176

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedSeptember 22, 1994

Docket94-1045

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 F.3d 1176 (Cpc International Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cpc International Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant, 31 F.3d 1176 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

31 F.3d 1176
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

CPC INTERNATIONAL INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY, Defendant/Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 94-1045, 94-1060.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 11, 1994.
Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined
Sept. 22, 1994.*

Before NIES, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge:

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

*

Newman, Circuit Judge, would rehear the appeal in banc. Rich, Circuit Judge, did not participate in the vote

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI