C.P. v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

C.P. v. State

515 So. 2d 982, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 601, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2537, 1987 WL 21480

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 3, 1987

DocketNo. 70532

StatusPublished

This text of 515 So. 2d 982 (C.P. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C.P. v. State, 515 So. 2d 982, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 601, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2537, 1987 WL 21480 (Fla. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

OVERTON, Justice.

We have for review C.P. v. State, 505 So.2d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), in which the district court, citing State v. McGee, 494 So.2d 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), affirmed the charge of possession with intent to sell less than twenty grams of cannabis as a third-degree felony, rather than a first-degree misdemeanor. We accepted jurisdiction on the basis of acknowledged conflict with Franklin v. State, 346 So.2d 137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). In our recent decision in McGee v. State, 509 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1987), we resolved the conflict in accordance with the district court’s view in the instant case. [983]*983Accordingly, we approve the decision of the district court.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OVERTON, Justice.

We have for review C.P. v. State, 505 So.2d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), in which the district court, citing State v. McGee, 494 So.2d 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), affirmed the charge of possession with intent to sell less than twenty grams of cannabis as a third-degree felony, rather than a first-degree misdemeanor. We accepted jurisdiction on the basis of acknowledged conflict with Franklin v. State, 346 So.2d 137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). In our recent decision in McGee v. State, 509 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1987), we resolved the conflict in accordance with the district court’s view in the instant case. [983]*983Accordingly, we approve the decision of the district court.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

515 So. 2d 982, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 601, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2537, 1987 WL 21480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cp-v-state-fla-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack