C.P. Motion, Inc. v. Bal Bay Associates, Inc.

944 So. 2d 552, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21583, 2006 WL 3782962
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 27, 2006·No. No. 3D05-2588·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cardinal Inv. Group, Inc. v. Giles, 813 So.2d 262 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc. v. Cal. Pub. Employees’ Ret. Sys., 685 So.2d 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), review denied, 691 So.2d 1081 (Fla.1997), and cited cases; Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc., 408 So.2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C.P. Motion, Inc. v. Bal Bay Associates, Inc., 944 So. 2d 552, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21583, 2006 WL 3782962 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

944 So. 2d 552 (C.P. Motion, Inc. v. Bal Bay Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cardinal Inv. Group, Inc. v. Giles
813 So. 2d 262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc.
408 So. 2d 735 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Mayor's Jewellers v. Calif. Pers
685 So. 2d 904 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)