Cozzens v. State
This text of 197 So. 3d 1080 (Cozzens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A jury convicted William Cozzens of burgling a dwelling. On appeal, he chai-' lenges the trial court’s decision to allow into evidence a statement Cozzens ma.de to police. We find no, error in this ruling, and we affirm the conviction. But. the State and we agree with Cozzens’s additional complaint that the court imposed restitution without holding a hearing. We reverse the order and judgment of restitution. On remand the court may- reimpose restitution only if it first conducts a restitution hearing.
Affirmed in part, reversed in, part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 So. 3d 1080, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16717, 2015 WL 6796902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cozzens-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.