Cozier v. Baah
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 599 (Cozier v. Baah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered July 13, 2015, after a jury trial, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered July 27, 2015, which denied plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.
The jury’s finding that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury to her cervical or lumbar spine within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the motor vehicle accident was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Spagnoli-Scheman v Bellew, 91 AD3d 414 [1st Dept 2012]). There was conflicting expert testimony as to whether plaintiff’s *723 injuries resulted from the accident or were preexisting chronic or congenital conditions unrelated to the accident, and the jury was “entitled to accept or reject the testimony of plaintiffs’ experts in whole or in part” (see id. at 414 [internal quotation marks omitted]).
We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 599, 146 A.D.3d 722, 47 N.Y.S.3d 263, 2017 WL 401322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cozier-v-baah-nyappdiv-2017.