Cozart v. Webb
This text of Cozart v. Webb (Cozart v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6861
HAMILTON COZART, JR., a/k/a Edwin Barfield,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BURT WEBB; JAMES SANDERSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (CA-04-213-5-FL)
Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 19, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hamilton Cozart, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Hamilton Cozart, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as time-barred.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Cozart v. Webb, No. CA-04-213-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 27,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cozart v. Webb, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cozart-v-webb-ca4-2004.