Cozart v. Webb

Fourth Circuit

Cozart v. Webb

107 F. App'x 345

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 19, 2004·No. No. 04-6861·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Hamilton Cozart, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as time-barred, We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cozart v. Webb, No. CA-04-213-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Hamilton Cozart, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as time-barred, We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cozart v. Webb, No. CA-04-213-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cozart v. Webb, 107 F. App'x 345 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

107 F. App'x 345 (Cozart v. Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related