Cozard v. McAden
67 S.E. 1130, 151 N.C. 743, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 418
This text of 67 S.E. 1130 (Cozard v. McAden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cozard v. McAden, 67 S.E. 1130, 151 N.C. 743, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 418 (N.C. 1909).
Opinion
from Graham.
The Court being evenly divided in opinion (Hoke, J., not sitting; Clark, C. J., and Manning, J., voting to affirm; Walker and Brown, JJ., voting to reverse), the judgment below stands affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
67 S.E. 1130, 151 N.C. 743, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cozard-v-mcaden-nc-1909.