Coyne v. Bersani
This text of 463 N.E.2d 371 (Coyne v. Bersani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
opinion of the court
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 961), to which we add that the submission by defendant at plaintiff’s request of reports to other doctors independently consulted by plaintiff does not evidence the continuing trust and confidence which is one of the predicates for the, continuous treatment doctrine on which plaintiff seeks to rely (see Greene v Greene, 56 NY2d 86, 94; Barrella v Richmond Mem. Hosp., 88 AD2d 379, 383).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
463 N.E.2d 371, 61 N.Y.2d 939, 474 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coyne-v-bersani-ny-1984.