Coyle v. Western Union

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Coyle v. Western Union

542 So. 2d 475, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1103, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2401, 1989 WL 46236

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 4, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2340

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 542 So. 2d 475 (Coyle v. Western Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coyle v. Western Union, 542 So. 2d 475, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1103, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2401, 1989 WL 46236 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There were two hearings conducted in this worker’s compensation cause, one on March 3, 1988, and a second on July 13, 1988. As a result of those hearings, one final compensation order was entered. In preparing the transcript of the record on appéal, the deputy commissioner determined that the tapes for the July 13 hearing were missing. This court relinquished jurisdiction to the deputy commissioner so that the parties could attempt to reconstruct the record on appeal. The deputy commissioner has now certified to this court that the record of the proceedings contained on the lost tapes cannot be reconstructed.

Appellees now file a motion to limit the new trial to matters raised in the July 13, 1988, hearing. The motion to limit the new trial is denied. The final order of the deputy commissioner is vacated and the cause is remanded for a hearing de novo. Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

JOANOS, THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There were two hearings conducted in this worker’s compensation cause, one on March 3, 1988, and a second on July 13, 1988. As a result of those hearings, one final compensation order was entered. In preparing the transcript of the record on appéal, the deputy commissioner determined that the tapes for the July 13 hearing were missing. This court relinquished jurisdiction to the deputy commissioner so that the parties could attempt to reconstruct the record on appeal. The deputy commissioner has now certified to this court that the record of the proceedings contained on the lost tapes cannot be reconstructed.

Appellees now file a motion to limit the new trial to matters raised in the July 13, 1988, hearing. The motion to limit the new trial is denied. The final order of the deputy commissioner is vacated and the cause is remanded for a hearing de novo. Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

JOANOS, THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

542 So. 2d 475, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1103, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2401, 1989 WL 46236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coyle-v-western-union-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack