Coyle v. Walker

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Coyle v. Walker

767 So. 2d 607, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11698, 2000 WL 1283795

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 13, 2000

DocketNo. 4D00-529

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 767 So. 2d 607 (Coyle v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coyle v. Walker, 767 So. 2d 607, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11698, 2000 WL 1283795 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William H. Coyle seeks certiorari review of a circuit court’s order that denied his request for belated appeal of a 1996 county court conviction. Coyle, who was not represented by counsel at the time of his conviction, argued that the trial court did not advise him of his right to appeal.

We grant the petition in part, and remand the case to the circuit court appellate division. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(3); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.670; Robinson v. Wainwright, 245 So.2d 867 (Fla.1971); see also Patterson v. State, 736 So.2d 1270 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Upon remand the circuit court shall appoint a commissioner to make findings of fact in connection with the “reasonable diligence” component of rule 9.140(j)(3). Thereafter, it shall grant the appropriate relief.

FARMER, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William H. Coyle seeks certiorari review of a circuit court’s order that denied his request for belated appeal of a 1996 county court conviction. Coyle, who was not represented by counsel at the time of his conviction, argued that the trial court did not advise him of his right to appeal.

We grant the petition in part, and remand the case to the circuit court appellate division. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(3); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.670; Robinson v. Wainwright, 245 So.2d 867 (Fla.1971); see also Patterson v. State, 736 So.2d 1270 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Upon remand the circuit court shall appoint a commissioner to make findings of fact in connection with the “reasonable diligence” component of rule 9.140(j)(3). Thereafter, it shall grant the appropriate relief.

FARMER, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

767 So. 2d 607, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11698, 2000 WL 1283795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coyle-v-walker-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack