Coyle v. New York State Civil Service Commission

50 A.D.2d 645, 374 N.Y.S.2d 442, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12467
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 645 (Coyle v. New York State Civil Service Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coyle v. New York State Civil Service Commission, 50 A.D.2d 645, 374 N.Y.S.2d 442, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered October 24, 1974 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, for a judgment requiring respondents to reclassify petitioner’s position. Petitioner currently holds the position of Head Industrial Shop Worker (Grade 11) at Pilgrim State Hospital, which position has as its duties supervision of industrial shop workers as well as patients or inmates in various trades and work processes performed at said institution. He seeks reclassification to the position of Chief Industrial Shop Worker (Grade 13), which, according to specifications of the Department of Civil Service "performs duties comparable to those of a Head Industrial Shop Worker, but involving a greater degree of responsibility because of the various factors set forth in said specifications”. We agree with Special Term that there is adequate basis in the record for finding that the denial of petitioner’s application by respondents was neither arbitrary or capricious, but was based upon consideration and analysis of the facts presented in petitioner’s application. The Director of Classification and Compensation could properly find, as he did, that petitioner was not performing the duties of a Chief Industrial Shop Worker, and that since patients or inmates were no longer engaged in any of the operations in which they had formerly participated, there was no basis for the appointment of a Chief Industrial Shop Worker at Pilgrim State Hospital. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Koreman, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blumenthal v. Bahou
76 A.D.2d 1026 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A.D.2d 645, 374 N.Y.S.2d 442, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coyle-v-new-york-state-civil-service-commission-nyappdiv-1975.