Coyle v. Harper
This text of 622 So. 2d 302 (Coyle v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs, Gail Coyle and her daughter, Wendy Hicks, a minor, appeal from a summary judgment for the defendant, Ann Harper, in their action alleging negligent supervision. Hicks was a student in Harper's class in Putnam Middle School. She was injured by another student in the classroom while Harper was monitoring the halls during or immediately after the change of classes. Harper was performing a discretionary function and is therefore immune from liability. Nance v. Matthews,
AFFIRMED.
HORNSBY, C.J., and HOUSTON, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
622 So. 2d 302, 1993 WL 103488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coyle-v-harper-ala-1993.