Coyle v. Gabel
This text of 235 N.E.2d 775 (Coyle v. Gabel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent, in the following memorandum: The Administrator was not bound by the doctrine of res judicata to hold that 206 Warren Street was decontrolled. The 1943 registration was a mere unilateral declaration and it [810]*810was not an adjudication of anything. It is our opinion, however, that the Administrator’s determination was not supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Amorelli v. Berman, 19 N Y 2d 960).
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Beroan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 N.E.2d 775, 21 N.Y.2d 808, 288 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coyle-v-gabel-ny-1968.