Coyle v. Gabel

235 N.E.2d 775, 21 N.Y.2d 808, 288 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1612
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 1968·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent, in the following memorandum: The Administrator was not bound by the doctrine of res judicata to hold that 206 Warren Street was decontrolled. The 1943 registration was a mere unilateral declaration and it [810] was not an adjudication of anything. It is our opinion, however, that the Administrator’s determination was not supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Amorelli v. Berman, 19 N Y 2d 960).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Beroan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coyle v. Gabel, 235 N.E.2d 775, 21 N.Y.2d 808, 288 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1612 (N.Y. 1968).

235 N.E.2d 775 (Coyle v. Gabel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buxbaum v. Tessier
19 A.D.3d 629 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
State v. Moskowitz
104 Misc. 2d 170 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Taylor v. New York City Transit Authority
309 F. Supp. 785 (E.D. New York, 1970)