Coyle v. Cleary

116 Mass. 208, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 63
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 28, 1874·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The old wall and the occupation in accordance therewith, as existing when each party to this action acquired his title and for many years before, were rightly submitted to the jury as evidence of the true line between them. Hathaway v. Evans, 108 Mass. 267. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coyle v. Cleary, 116 Mass. 208, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 63 (Mass. 1874).

116 Mass. 208 (Coyle v. Cleary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Gingras
331 N.E.2d 819 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1975)
Sutcliffe v. Burns
1 N.E.2d 23 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1936)
Peavey v. Moran
152 N.E. 360 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1926)
Morrison v. Holder
101 N.E. 1067 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
Frost v. Bresnan
1 Davis. L. Ct. Cas. 164 (Massachusetts Land Court, 1904)
Beckman v. Davidson
39 N.E. 38 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)
Holloran v. Holloran
21 N.E. 374 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1889)
Cook v. Knowles
38 Mich. 316 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1878)