Coyle v. Castle

201 Ill. App. 1, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 1073
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 13, 1915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Graves

delivered the opinion of the court.

11. Partnership, § 407*—when evidence sufficient to sustain allowance of item in action for accounting. A ruling of the trial court in a partnership accounting as to the correctness of a certain item as charged, sustained, though at variance with the deductions made by a partisan expert accountant from records not preserved in the abstract, where witnesses had been heard by the trial court and the expert’s deductions were shown to be unreliable. 12. Costs, § 73*—when appellant properly charged with cost of additional abstract. Where the appellant’s abstract on appeal was defective, the cost of an additional abstract furnished by the appellee was, on affirmance of the judgment, taxed against the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coyle v. Castle, 201 Ill. App. 1, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 1073 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

201 Ill. App. 1 (Coyle v. Castle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fromm v. New Staunton Coal Co.
211 Ill. App. 3 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)