Coykendall v. . Harrison

99 N.E. 1105, 206 N.Y. 657, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1049
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 29, 1912·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; second question certified answered in the negative; first question not answered because it presents a question of fact and not of law; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Willard Bartlett, Hiscocic and Chase, JJ.; Cray, Werner and Collin, JJ., vote for dismissal of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coykendall v. . Harrison, 99 N.E. 1105, 206 N.Y. 657, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1049 (N.Y. 1912).

99 N.E. 1105 (Coykendall v. . Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.