Coy v. RUTLEDGE OIL COMPANY
240 S.W.3d 744, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1680
Opinion
Order
Leonard Russell Coy appeals from an entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants Jack Cooper Transport (JCT), Rutledge Oil Company (Rutledge), Thomas Cooper, and Charles Potter.
Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coy v. RUTLEDGE OIL COMPANY, 240 S.W.3d 744, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1680 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
240 S.W.3d 744 (Coy v. RUTLEDGE OIL COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections
240 S.W.3d 744 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)