Coy v. Court Diagnostic & Treatment Center

Ohio Court of Appeals

Coy v. Court Diagnostic & Treatment Center

761 N.E.2d 697, 144 Ohio App. 3d 779, 2001 Ohio App. LEXIS 3742

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 21, 2001

DocketCourt of Appeals No. L-01-1341.

StatusPublished

This text of 761 N.E.2d 697 (Coy v. Court Diagnostic & Treatment Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coy v. Court Diagnostic & Treatment Center, 761 N.E.2d 697, 144 Ohio App. 3d 779, 2001 Ohio App. LEXIS 3742 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Handwork, Judge.

David R. Coy is asking this court to issue a writ of mandamus to compel the Court Diagnostic & Treatment Center (“center”) to release a copy of a report of the results of a mental competence evaluation that was performed on Coy at the center. Sixth Dist.Loc.App.R. 6 provides: “An original action, other than habeas corpus, shall be instituted by the filing of an original and three copies of a complaint. The petitioner or relator shall also file a praecipe directing the clerk of the court of appeals to serve a copy of the complaint on each other party at the addresses listed in the praecipe.” (Emphasis added.) No praecipe was filed by *780 Coy. Accordingly, this court orders Coy’s petition for mandamus dismissed for failure to comply with Sixth Dist.Lo.c.App.R. 6. Costs to petitioner Coy.

Petition dismissed.

Mark L. Pietrykowski, P.J., and Melvin L. Resnick, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Handwork, Judge.

David R. Coy is asking this court to issue a writ of mandamus to compel the Court Diagnostic & Treatment Center (“center”) to release a copy of a report of the results of a mental competence evaluation that was performed on Coy at the center. Sixth Dist.Loc.App.R. 6 provides: “An original action, other than habeas corpus, shall be instituted by the filing of an original and three copies of a complaint. The petitioner or relator shall also file a praecipe directing the clerk of the court of appeals to serve a copy of the complaint on each other party at the addresses listed in the praecipe.” (Emphasis added.) No praecipe was filed by *780 Coy. Accordingly, this court orders Coy’s petition for mandamus dismissed for failure to comply with Sixth Dist.Lo.c.App.R. 6. Costs to petitioner Coy.

Petition dismissed.

Mark L. Pietrykowski, P.J., and Melvin L. Resnick, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

761 N.E.2d 697, 144 Ohio App. 3d 779, 2001 Ohio App. LEXIS 3742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coy-v-court-diagnostic-treatment-center-ohioctapp-2001.