Coxhead v. . Johnson

54 N.E. 780, 160 N.Y. 369, 14 E.H. Smith 369, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 1166
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 10, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 54 N.E. 780 (Coxhead v. . Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coxhead v. . Johnson, 54 N.E. 780, 160 N.Y. 369, 14 E.H. Smith 369, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 1166 (N.Y. 1899).

Opinion

Haight, J.

The plaintiff asks to have her case advanced and put upon the preferred calendar of the court, pursuant to the provisions of chapter 355 of the Laws of 1899. That act became a law April 18,1899, but, under its express provision, was not to take effect until September first, 1899, The provisions of the act add a new subdivision, numbered 12, to section 791 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides for a preference in civil actions in the Court of Appeals of all appeals from judgments of affirmance rendered by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in cases enumerated in subdivision two of section 191 of the Code.

At the time this appeal was taken and the case placed upon the calendar it was not entitled to any preference. If it is now to be moved forward and placed upon the preferred calendar all cases similarly situated, which may be quite numerous, will be entitled to the same preference, practically necessitating the making of a new calendar. As we understand the provisions of the act it was not intended to operate retroactively, but applies to cases in which appeals shall thereafter be taken, and not to pending cases upon the existing calendar.

The motion should be denied, without costs.

All-concur.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Koehne v. . New York and Queens County Railway Company
55 N.E. 1096 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
O'Flaherty v. . Nassau Electric Railroad Company
55 N.E. 1098 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
O'Flaherty v. Nassau Electric Railroad
160 N.Y. 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 N.E. 780, 160 N.Y. 369, 14 E.H. Smith 369, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 1166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coxhead-v-johnson-ny-1899.