Cox v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cox v. Wilson

157 S.E. 265, 172 Ga. 180, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 48

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 12, 1931

DocketNo. 7877

StatusPublished

This text of 157 S.E. 265 (Cox v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cox v. Wilson, 157 S.E. 265, 172 Ga. 180, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 48 (Ga. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

In this case all questions of law and fact were submitted to an auditor. All ruling's upon the pleadings were included in the submission. After hearing evidence he made a report upon the evidence, denominated a finding of fact, and he also made a finding of law; each finding being in compliance with the provisions of the Code. The defendant filed exceptions to these findings, and to the conclusion reached by the auditor upon the application of the law to the facts as reported by him. The trial judge overruled the exceptions. There was no error in approving the auditor’s findings and in overruling the exceptions.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Beek, P. J., absent for providential cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, C. J.

In this case all questions of law and fact were submitted to an auditor. All ruling's upon the pleadings were included in the submission. After hearing evidence he made a report upon the evidence, denominated a finding of fact, and he also made a finding of law; each finding being in compliance with the provisions of the Code. The defendant filed exceptions to these findings, and to the conclusion reached by the auditor upon the application of the law to the facts as reported by him. The trial judge overruled the exceptions. There was no error in approving the auditor’s findings and in overruling the exceptions.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Beek, P. J., absent for providential cause.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 S.E. 265, 172 Ga. 180, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-wilson-ga-1931.