Cox v. Wells

57 A.D.2d 635, 394 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11658
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 1977·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding, inter alia, to validate petitions designating petitioner-appellant as a candidate in the election to be held on May 3, 1977 for the public position of Member of the New York City Community School Board, District 23, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 7, 1977, which, after a hearing, (1) denied the petition and (2) directed the board of elections to remove petitioner’s name from the appropriate ballot. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Special Term found that petitioner had only 191 valid signatures, 9 short of the required 200. Petitioner argues that a sheet containing an additional nine signatures should be validated. The subscribing witness on the afore-mentioned sheet had incorrectly listed both her election and assembly districts. Numerous cases have held that this error is fatal, unless it is caused by confusion due to reapportionment. Since petitioner was not able to prove that such confusion was the reason for the error, the signatures cannot be validated [636]*636and her application was properly denied (see Matter of Sciarra v Donnelly, 34 NY2d 970; Matter of Rutter v Coveney, 38 NY2d 993). Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. Wells, 57 A.D.2d 635, 394 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11658 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

57 A.D.2d 635 (Cox v. Wells) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phanelson v. Pabon
192 A.D.2d 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Higby v. Mahoney
396 N.E.2d 183 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)