Cox v. Vulcan Basement Waterproofing Co.

230 S.E.2d 86, 140 Ga. App. 30, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1338
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 19, 1976·No. 52784·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

This post-judgment garnishment case is controlled by Coursin v. Harper, 236 Ga. 729 (225 SE2d 428), as the affidavit upon which the summons of garnishment was issued was given prior to July 1, 1975. Battles v. Battles, 138 Ga. App. 841 (227 SE2d 524). This proceeding must therefore be declared "void and of no effect” (Rose, Silverman & Hunt v. Ben O’Callaghan Co., 134 Ga. App. 648 (215 SE2d 515), where we decided the issue sua sponte), and the judgment dismissing the proceeding is affirmed. "It is fundamental that a judgment of a trial court which is right will be affirmed on appeal even though the trial judge in rendering his judgment may have assigned a wrong reason therefor.” Sims T. V., Inc. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 108 Ga. App. 41, 43 (131 SE2d 790).

Judgment affirmed.

Been, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. Vulcan Basement Waterproofing Co., 230 S.E.2d 86, 140 Ga. App. 30, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1338 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

230 S.E.2d 86 (Cox v. Vulcan Basement Waterproofing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stocks v. Colonial Stores, Inc.
240 S.E.2d 151 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)