Cox v. United States

585 U.S. 528, 138 S. Ct. 2273, 201 L. Ed. 2d 676, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 3839
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 22, 2018·No. 16-1017·Published

Opinion

(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 585 U. S. ____ (2018) 1

Per Curiam

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________

No. 16–1017 _________________

LAITH G. COX, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES

COURTNEY A. CRAIG, PETITIONER v. UNITED

STATES

ANDREW K. LEWIS, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES IAN T. MILLER, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES

JOSEPH D. MORCHINEK, PETITIONER v. UNITED

KELVIN L. O’SHAUGHNESSY, PETITIONER v.

UNITED STATES

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF

APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

[June 22, 2018]

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently

granted. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. United States, 585 U.S. 528, 138 S. Ct. 2273, 201 L. Ed. 2d 676, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 3839 (2018).

585 U.S. 528 (Cox v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.