Cox v. United States
Opinion
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 585 U. S. ____ (2018) 1
Per Curiam
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________
No. 16–1017 _________________
LAITH G. COX, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES
COURTNEY A. CRAIG, PETITIONER v. UNITED
STATES
ANDREW K. LEWIS, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES IAN T. MILLER, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES
JOSEPH D. MORCHINEK, PETITIONER v. UNITED
KELVIN L. O’SHAUGHNESSY, PETITIONER v.
UNITED STATES
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
[June 22, 2018]
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently
granted. It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
585 U.S. 528 (Cox v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.