Cox v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Cox v. United States

402 F. App'x 801

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 29, 2010·No. No. 10-2146·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

TiJon Cox appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), (in) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cox v. United States, No. 1:10-cv-02650JFM (D. Md. filed Sept. 29, 2010 & entered Sept. 80, 2010). We further deny as moot Cox’s motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

TiJon Cox appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), (in) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cox v. United States, No. 1:10-cv-02650JFM (D. Md. filed Sept. 29, 2010 & entered Sept. 80, 2010). We further deny as moot Cox’s motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cox v. United States, 402 F. App'x 801 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

402 F. App'x 801 (Cox v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related