Cox v. Territory

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Cox v. Territory

1898 OK 8, 52 P. 1134, 6 Okla. 581, 1898 Okla. LEXIS 82

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 18, 1898·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appellant was indicted and convicted under sec. 13, art. 4, ch. 2, Laws of Oklahoma, of the crime of misbranding cattle, and Avas, on the 16th day of October, 1S95, sentenced to imprisonment in the territorial penintentiary for a period of eighteen months.

The appeal was not filed in the supreme court until March 22, 1897. In Swan v. United States, 2 Oklahoma, 114, this court held that sec. 4, art. 16, of our procedure criminal act, limits the time in which appeals may be taken to one year. We are still of the same opinion,'and the appeal is therefore dismissed.

Bierer, J., having presided in the court below, not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appellant was indicted and convicted under sec. 13, art. 4, ch. 2, Laws of Oklahoma, of the crime of misbranding cattle, and Avas, on the 16th day of October, 1S95, sentenced to imprisonment in the territorial penintentiary for a period of eighteen months.

The appeal was not filed in the supreme court until March 22, 1897. In Swan v. United States, 2 Oklahoma, 114, this court held that sec. 4, art. 16, of our procedure criminal act, limits the time in which appeals may be taken to one year. We are still of the same opinion,'and the appeal is therefore dismissed.

Bierer, J., having presided in the court below, not sitting.

Cox v. Territory, 1898 OK 8, 52 P. 1134, 6 Okla. 581, 1898 Okla. LEXIS 82 (Okla. 1898).

Pincite

1898 OK 8 (Cox v. Territory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related