Cox v. Stuckey

153 So. 898, 114 Fla. 488
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 4, 1934·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

— The appeal here is from a decree dismissing a bill of complaint which sought to vacate a final decree theretofore entered in a chancery cause upon the ground that the defendant had not been served with process. Return of the sheriff showed legal service. No fraud or collusion participated in by the complainant in the original suit is averred.

The decree should be affirmed on (authority of the opinion and judgment in Lewter v. Hadley, 68 Fla. 131, 66 Sou. 567; Allison v. Handy-Andy Community Stores, Inc., 106 Fla. 274, 143 Sou. 263.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

*489 Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. Stuckey, 153 So. 898, 114 Fla. 488 (Fla. 1934).

153 So. 898 (Cox v. Stuckey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allison v. Handy Andy Community Stores, Inc.
143 So. 263 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Lewter v. Hadley
66 So. 567 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1914)