Cox v. Stuckey
This text of 153 So. 898 (Cox v. Stuckey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
— The appeal here is from a decree dismissing a bill of complaint which sought to vacate a final decree theretofore entered in a chancery cause upon the ground that the defendant had not been served with process. Return of the sheriff showed legal service. No fraud or collusion participated in by the complainant in the original suit is averred.
The decree should be affirmed on (authority of the opinion and judgment in Lewter v. Hadley, 68 Fla. 131, 66 Sou. 567; Allison v. Handy-Andy Community Stores, Inc., 106 Fla. 274, 143 Sou. 263.
It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
*489 Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis and Buford, J. J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 So. 898, 114 Fla. 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-stuckey-fla-1934.