Cox v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cox v. State

56 S.W.2d 1114

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 8, 1933

DocketNo. 15849

StatusPublished

This text of 56 S.W.2d 1114 (Cox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cox v. State, 56 S.W.2d 1114 (Tex. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of equipment for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The indictment is regular and regularly presented. The facts heard in the trial court [1115]*1115are not brought forward for review. We find no bills of exception complaining of the ruling of the court. We have perceived no fault or irregularity in the procedure which would nullify the conviction or require discussion.

The judgment .is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of equipment for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The indictment is regular and regularly presented. The facts heard in the trial court [1115]*1115are not brought forward for review. We find no bills of exception complaining of the ruling of the court. We have perceived no fault or irregularity in the procedure which would nullify the conviction or require discussion.

The judgment .is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 S.W.2d 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-state-texcrimapp-1933.