Cox v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Cox v. State

1912 OK CR 348, 124 P. 1131, 7 Okla. Crim. 741, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 233

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided June 15, 1912·No. No. A-1078.·Published

Opinion

*742 PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Mack Cox, was convicted in the county court of Garter county, at the January, 1911, term, on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and adjudged to pay a fine of two hundred dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of ninety days. We have carefully considered the record and briefs in this case. The issue is a pure question of fact-, and we do not feel that the verdict of the jury should be disturbed. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*742 PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Mack Cox, was convicted in the county court of Garter county, at the January, 1911, term, on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and adjudged to pay a fine of two hundred dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of ninety days. We have carefully considered the record and briefs in this case. The issue is a pure question of fact-, and we do not feel that the verdict of the jury should be disturbed. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cox v. State, 1912 OK CR 348, 124 P. 1131, 7 Okla. Crim. 741, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 233 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK CR 348 (Cox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.