Cox v. State
This text of 515 S.W.2d 199 (Cox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Barry County denying appellant’s motions for relief under Rules 25.04 and 27.26, V.A.M.R., from a six-year sentence for burglary.
An evidentiary hearing was conducted. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were made and entered adversely to appellant’s claims of lack of jurisdiction and involuntariness of his guilty plea.
We have reviewed the transcript of the hearing below, including the record made at the time of appellant’s plea of guilty, and conclude the findings, conclusions and judgment are not clearly erroneous.
No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value.
Affirmed. Rule 84.16, V.A.M.R.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
515 S.W.2d 199, 1974 Mo. App. LEXIS 1768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-state-moctapp-1974.