Cox v. State

914 So. 2d 1073, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18767, 2005 WL 3179948
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cox v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12343
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 2005·No. No. 2D05-2469·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Allen Cox appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, Cox raised four claims for relief. We affirm without comment as to the denial of all but one of Cox’s claims. As to Cox’s claim that the trial court erroneously utilized the 1.5 domestic violence multiplier on the criminal punishment code score-sheet, we affirm without prejudice to any right Cox may have to raise his claim of scoresheet error or to seek to withdraw his plea in a timely, facially sufficient motion [1074]*1074for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Romero v. State, 805 So.2d 92 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Affirmed.

STRINGER, SILBERMAN, and CANADY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. State, 914 So. 2d 1073, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18767, 2005 WL 3179948 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

914 So. 2d 1073 (Cox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Romero v. State
805 So. 2d 92 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)