Cox v. State

103 So. 171, 89 Fla. 29
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 24, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 So. 171 (Cox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. State, 103 So. 171, 89 Fla. 29 (Fla. 1925).

Opinion

West, J.

The defendant, plaintiff in error in this court, was indicted, charged with burning a building in *30 surecl against loss or clamagu by fire, with intent to injure the insurer, the offense denounced by Section 5111, Revised General Statutes. Upon a trial he was convicted. Writ of error was taken from this court to review the judgment.

The ease grew out of the same transaction, the evidence is practically the same, and in all material respects the questions are the same, as presented in the companion case of Bryant v. State, opinion in which is this day filed.

Upon authority of Bryant v. State, Ihe judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Wjtiteield, 1?. J., and Terrell, J. J., concur. Taylor, C. J., and Ellis and Browne, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Overstreet v. State
184 So. 485 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 So. 171, 89 Fla. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-state-fla-1925.