Cox v. State

2015 Ark. 37
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 5, 2015
DocketCR-14-965
StatusPublished

This text of 2015 Ark. 37 (Cox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. State, 2015 Ark. 37 (Ark. 2015).

Opinion

Cite as 2015 Ark. 37

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-14-965

WENDIE COX Opinion Delivered February 5, 2015 APPELLANT MOTION TO FILE BELATED BRIEF V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS MOTION GRANTED. APPELLEE

PER CURIAM

Appellant Wendie Cox, by and through her attorney, Jeffery H. Kearney, has filed a

motion to file a belated brief. In this motion, counsel also seeks an extension of time in which

to submit appellant’s opening brief.

On November 12, 2014, counsel lodged the record with our clerk, making appellant’s

brief due for filing on December 22, 2014. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(a) (2014). However,

counsel failed to file appellant’s brief on that date, nor did counsel request in advance an

extension of time in which to file the brief. In the pending motion, counsel accepts full

responsibility for having failed to timely file the brief.

This court will accept a criminal appellant’s belated brief to prevent an appeal from

being aborted. Thompson v. State, 2013 Ark. 312 (per curiam). However, good cause must

be shown to grant the motion. Mister v. State, 2013 Ark. 269 (per curiam) (citing Strom v.

State, 356 Ark. 224, 147 S.W.3d 689 (2004) (per curiam) (holding that appellate counsel’s

admitted failure to timely filed the brief constitutes good cause to grant a motion for belated Cite as 2015 Ark. 37

brief)).

Counsel’s admission of fault for failing to file appellant’s brief on time is good cause to

permit the filing of a belated brief. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and also grant

a final extension for the brief to be filed on or before February 9, 2015.

A copy of this order will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Motion granted.

2 CR-14-965

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. State
2013 Ark. 312 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2013)
Strom v. State
147 S.W.3d 689 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2015 Ark. 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-state-ark-2015.