Cox v. State

85 So. 925, 17 Ala. App. 691
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 29, 1920
Docket4 Div. 654.
StatusPublished

This text of 85 So. 925 (Cox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. State, 85 So. 925, 17 Ala. App. 691 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was convicted “as charged” under an indictment charging him with the offense of grand larceny. The appeal is upon the record proper without a bill of exceptions. This record has been examined, and we find no error therein. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 So. 925, 17 Ala. App. 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-state-alactapp-1920.