Cox v. Shaw

90 S.E.2d 327, 243 N.C. 191, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 561
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 30, 1955·Published

Opinion

PeR CuRiam.

When the cause came on to be heard on exceptions filed, the court had authority to affirm, amend, modify, set aside, confirm in whole or in part, or disaffirm the report of the referee. Quevedo v. Deans, 234 N.C. 618, 68 S.E. 2d 275; Keith v. Silvia, 233 N.C. 328, 64 S.E. 2d 178; G.S. 1-194, 195. The order vacating the report of the referee and ordering a new survey was purely interlocutory. It affected no substantial right of the parties. G.S. 1-277. Appeal therefrom was fragmentary and premature. Whitehurst v. Hinton, 222 N.C. 85, 21 S.E. 2d 874.

We may note that the motion for a new survey made before the court below is quite different from the motion made before exceptions were filed. At the time Carr, J., signed his order, the reference was not before him for consideration. Keith v. Silvia, supra.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. Shaw, 90 S.E.2d 327, 243 N.C. 191, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 561 (N.C. 1955).

90 S.E.2d 327 (Cox v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keith v. Silvia
64 S.E.2d 178 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Quevedo v. Deans
68 S.E.2d 275 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Whitehurst v. . Hinton
21 S.E.2d 874 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)