Cox v. Seely

93 S.E. 421, 20 Ga. App. 629, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1011
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 29, 1917
Docket8512
StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E. 421 (Cox v. Seely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. Seely, 93 S.E. 421, 20 Ga. App. 629, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1011 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur. Hendricks, Mills & Hendricks, for plaintiff in error. Ira S. Clary, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 421, 20 Ga. App. 629, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-seely-gactapp-1917.