Cox v. Runnion

5 Blackf. 176, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 79
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 18, 1839
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Blackf. 176 (Cox v. Runnion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. Runnion, 5 Blackf. 176, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 79 (Ind. 1839).

Opinion

ASSUMPSIT against Andrew Runnion and Mary his wife, for a debt due from the wife dum sola. Held, that it was no objection to the declaration that the Christian name only of the wife was stated. Lilly’s Entries, 27.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Blackf. 176, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-runnion-ind-1839.