Cox v. Rogers
This text of 32 A.D.2d 871 (Cox v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum herein, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Issues are presented in the moving papers not only as to whether the defendants landlords are responsible for code violations on the premises and for a failure to correct them but also as to plaintiffs’ own direct responsibility as tenants for their creation and maintenance. As stated in Town of Southeast v. Gonnella (26 A D 2d 550) “ In the absence of a clear right to the relief demanded, injunctive relief should not be granted until the issues have been fully explored and the entire matter resolved after plenary trial.” In the circumstances presented by the moving papers injunctive relief should not be granted without a resolution of the factual issues on the trial. (Appeal from certain parts of order of Onondaga Special Term granting preliminary injunction and denying motion to dismiss complaint.) Present— Del Vecehio, J. P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 A.D.2d 871, 301 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-rogers-nyappdiv-1969.