Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/Cox v. Roberts

Cox v. Roberts

27 So. 2d 617, 248 Ala. 372, 1946 Ala. LEXIS 242
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedOctober 17, 1946
Docket6 Div. 390.
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 27 So. 2d 617 (Cox v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. Roberts, 27 So. 2d 617, 248 Ala. 372, 1946 Ala. LEXIS 242 (Ala. 1946).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The majority of the court concur in the opinion of Justice LAWSON, appearing below, except in the one particular instance as to the action of the court in giving Charge No. 36 at defendant’s request. As to this charge, we entertain the view there is no conflict in this given charge and that given for the plaintiff as to the question of agency. That the charge given for defendant correctly stated the law is not questioned, and we entertain the view that if in fact there was any misleading tendency, in view of the charge given for plaintiff, it was one (readily) to be remedied by explanatory charge.

We therefore conclude the'case should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and FOSTER, LIVINGSTON, and STAKELY, JJ., concur. BROWN, LAWSON, and SIMPSON, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Colasurdo v. Waldt
752 P.2d 920 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1987)
Clark v. State
318 So. 2d 822 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1975)
Turner v. Hargrove
300 So. 2d 828 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1974)
Smith v. Johnson
214 So. 2d 846 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1968)
Muller v. State
218 So. 2d 698 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1968)
Coalite, Inc. v. Aldridge
229 So. 2d 524 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1968)
Stanley v. Hayes
165 So. 2d 84 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Rosalie Byrd, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Ollie Byrd, Sr., Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Ollie Byrd, Jr.
298 F.2d 586 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Byrd
298 F.2d 586 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
Anderson v. Howard Hall Company
131 So. 2d 417 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1961)
Red's Electric Company v. Beasley
129 So. 2d 676 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1961)
Sims v. Struthers
100 So. 2d 23 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
Bishop v. Fordham
92 So. 2d 3 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
BARBER PURE MILK COMPANY v. Holmes
84 So. 2d 345 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hamm
81 So. 2d 915 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1955)
Hudson v. Stripling
73 So. 2d 514 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1954)
Schoenith, Inc. v. Forrester
69 So. 2d 454 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1953)
Avery Freight Lines, Inc. v. Stewart
63 So. 2d 895 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1953)
Brown v. Southeastern Greyhound Lines, Inc.
51 So. 2d 524 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
Jones v. Mullin
44 So. 2d 748 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 So. 2d 617, 248 Ala. 372, 1946 Ala. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-roberts-ala-1946.