Cox v. Principi

56 F. App'x 495
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJanuary 31, 2003
DocketNo. 03-7002
StatusPublished

This text of 56 F. App'x 495 (Cox v. Principi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. Principi, 56 F. App'x 495 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

Opinion

ON MOTION

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Amos Cox and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs respond to this court’s order directing them to show cause why Cox’s appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed.

[496]*496The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims dismissed Cox’s appeal as premature and entered judgment on July 10, 2002. On October 2, 2002, or 84 days after the entry of judgment, Cox filed a notice of appeal. An appeal must be filed within 60 days after judgment. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b). In response to our show cause order, Cox states that he is ill. However, the statutory requirement that an appeal be timely filed may not be waived. Sofarelli Associates, Inc. v. United States, 716 F.2d 1395 (Fed.Cir.1983) (appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction if notice of appeal is untimely).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) This appeal is dismissed as untimely.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 F. App'x 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-principi-cafc-2003.