Cox v. McMahon

Fourth Circuit

Cox v. McMahon

519 F. App'x 146

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 23, 2013·No. No. 13-1284·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert and Cherie Cox appeal the district court’s order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dis[147] miss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Cox v. McMahon, No. 2:12-cv-00689-AWA-LRL (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 14, & 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert and Cherie Cox appeal the district court’s order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dis[147] miss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Cox v. McMahon, No. 2:12-cv-00689-AWA-LRL (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 14, & 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cox v. McMahon, 519 F. App'x 146 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

519 F. App'x 146 (Cox v. McMahon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related