Cox v. Little Sabine, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cox v. Little Sabine, Inc.

938 So. 2d 526, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 12325, 2006 WL 2056427

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 2006·No. No. 1D05-4608·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sperka v. Little Sabine Bay, Inc., 642 So.2d 654, 654 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (finding “no error in the trial court’s ruling that the hotel and its owners had no duty to warn Sperka, a guest of the hotel, of the presence of the concealed sandbar” in the Gulf of Mexico near the Holiday Inn on Pensacola Beach, notwithstanding fact that the hotel was constructed to provide its guests with access to the adjoining beach and gulf, encouraged their use by providing guests with facilities on and near the beach, and advertised its facilities and amenities to attract guests to its hotel).

BENTON, PADOVANO, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sperka v. Little Sabine Bay, Inc., 642 So.2d 654, 654 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (finding “no error in the trial court’s ruling that the hotel and its owners had no duty to warn Sperka, a guest of the hotel, of the presence of the concealed sandbar” in the Gulf of Mexico near the Holiday Inn on Pensacola Beach, notwithstanding fact that the hotel was constructed to provide its guests with access to the adjoining beach and gulf, encouraged their use by providing guests with facilities on and near the beach, and advertised its facilities and amenities to attract guests to its hotel).

BENTON, PADOVANO, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Cox v. Little Sabine, Inc., 938 So. 2d 526, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 12325, 2006 WL 2056427 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

938 So. 2d 526 (Cox v. Little Sabine, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related