Cox v. Little Sabine, Inc.

938 So. 2d 526, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 12325, 2006 WL 2056427
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 26, 2006
DocketNo. 1D05-4608
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 938 So. 2d 526 (Cox v. Little Sabine, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. Little Sabine, Inc., 938 So. 2d 526, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 12325, 2006 WL 2056427 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sperka v. Little Sabine Bay, Inc., 642 So.2d 654, 654 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (finding “no error in the trial court’s ruling that the hotel and its owners had no duty to warn Sperka, a guest of the hotel, of the presence of the concealed sandbar” in the Gulf of Mexico near the Holiday Inn on Pensacola Beach, notwithstanding fact that the hotel was constructed to provide its guests with access to the adjoining beach and gulf, encouraged their use by providing guests with facilities on and near the beach, and advertised its facilities and amenities to attract guests to its hotel).

BENTON, PADOVANO, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jordan v. Jenne
938 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
938 So. 2d 526, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 12325, 2006 WL 2056427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-little-sabine-inc-fladistctapp-2006.