Cox v. . Jackson

2 N.C. 423
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided October 5, 1796·Published

Opinions

The goods are bound from the teste of the writ of execution, but that rule will not apply to the present case. John acted as the agent of his brother, who, having approved of what he did, ratified the transaction abinitio; so that the property of the latter horse passed to George Cox, and not to John, if the first horse really was George's. As to that the Court differed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. . Jackson, 2 N.C. 423 (N.C. Ct. App. 1796).

2 N.C. 423 (Cox v. . Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.