Cox v. . Jackson
2 N.C. 423
This text of 2 N.C. 423 (Cox v. . Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cox v. . Jackson, 2 N.C. 423 (N.C. Ct. App. 1796).
Opinions
The goods are bound from the teste of the writ of execution, but that rule will not apply to the present case. John acted as the agent of his brother, who, having approved of what he did, ratified the transaction abinitio; so that the property of the latter horse passed to George Cox, and not to John, if the first horse really was George's. As to that the Court differed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 N.C. 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-jackson-ncsuperct-1796.