Cox v. Hunter

54 S.W. 1102, 152 Mo. 584, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 256
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided December 12, 1899·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

VALLIANT, J.

This is a twin case with Henry Cox v. Boyce, found on page 576 of this volume; the facts being the same, except that the defendant here does not claim under [585]*585the curator’s deed, but holds the share of the .laud allotted to hiiTi in partition of the estate coining under his father’s will. The plaintiff claims to have inherited from his child her share or one-eighteenth of the land. But as shown in the Boyce case all the interest the child had passed to the purchaser under the curator’s deed, and the plaintiff inherited nothing.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the circuit court of Lincoln county with directions to enter judgment for the defendant.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. Hunter, 54 S.W. 1102, 152 Mo. 584, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 256 (Mo. 1899).

54 S.W. 1102 (Cox v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Stilwell v. Bone
1945 OK 109 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1945)
Potter v. Whitten
142 S.W. 453 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1911)