Cox v. Hunter

54 S.W. 1102, 152 Mo. 584, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 256
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedDecember 12, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 54 S.W. 1102 (Cox v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. Hunter, 54 S.W. 1102, 152 Mo. 584, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 256 (Mo. 1899).

Opinion

VALLIANT, J.

This is a twin case with Henry Cox v. Boyce, found on page 576 of this volume; the facts being the same, except that the defendant here does not claim under [585]*585the curator’s deed, but holds the share of the .laud allotted to hiiTi in partition of the estate coining under his father’s will. The plaintiff claims to have inherited from his child her share or one-eighteenth of the land. But as shown in the Boyce case all the interest the child had passed to the purchaser under the curator’s deed, and the plaintiff inherited nothing.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the circuit court of Lincoln county with directions to enter judgment for the defendant.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Stilwell v. Bone
1945 OK 109 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1945)
Potter v. Whitten
142 S.W. 453 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 S.W. 1102, 152 Mo. 584, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-hunter-mo-1899.