Cox v. Hawke

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Cox v. Hawke

99 N.Y.S. 1137

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 99 N.Y.S. 1137 (Cox v. Hawke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cox v. Hawke, 99 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action for brokers’ commissions. The case has been tried three times. The complaint was dismissed on each occasion. On this trial the plaintiff presented a case which clearly entitled him to go to the jury. The facts elicited differ in no wise from those brought out on the former trials. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an action for brokers’ commissions. The case has been tried three times. The complaint was dismissed on each occasion. On this trial the plaintiff presented a case which clearly entitled him to go to the jury. The facts elicited differ in no wise from those brought out on the former trials. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 N.Y.S. 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-hawke-nyappterm-1906.