Cox v. Hawke

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Cox v. Hawke

99 N.Y.S. 1137

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cox v. Hawke. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 Misc. 106 →

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 1, 1906·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action for brokers’ commissions. The case has been tried three times. The complaint was dismissed on each occasion. On this trial the plaintiff presented a case which clearly entitled him to go to the jury. The facts elicited differ in no wise from those brought out on the former trials. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an action for brokers’ commissions. The case has been tried three times. The complaint was dismissed on each occasion. On this trial the plaintiff presented a case which clearly entitled him to go to the jury. The facts elicited differ in no wise from those brought out on the former trials. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Cox v. Hawke, 99 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

99 N.Y.S. 1137 (Cox v. Hawke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.