Cox v. Harrison

100 S.E. 644, 24 Ga. App. 237, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 519
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 9, 1919
Docket10532
StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 644 (Cox v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. Harrison, 100 S.E. 644, 24 Ga. App. 237, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 519 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Bloodwortii, J.

The judge who heard this case »did not err in disallowing the proffered amendment to the petition, and in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur. Citations by counsel: Civil Code (1910), §§ 4643, 4954, 5343, 4354, 4635; Hay good v. Haden, 119 Ga. 463. See Knight v. Rogers, 33 Ga. App. 308. S. C. Crane, for plaintiff. Benjamin H. Hill, H. A. Allen, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haygood v. Haden
46 S.E. 625 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 644, 24 Ga. App. 237, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-harrison-gactapp-1919.