Cox v. Harrison

100 S.E. 644, 24 Ga. App. 237, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 519
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 9, 1919·No. 10532·Published

Opinion

Bloodwortii, J.

The judge who heard this case »did not err in disallowing the proffered amendment to the petition, and in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur. Citations by counsel: Civil Code (1910), §§ 4643, 4954, 5343, 4354, 4635; Hay good v. Haden, 119 Ga. 463. See Knight v. Rogers, 33 Ga. App. 308. S. C. Crane, for plaintiff. Benjamin H. Hill, H. A. Allen, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. Harrison, 100 S.E. 644, 24 Ga. App. 237, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 519 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

100 S.E. 644 (Cox v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haygood v. Haden
46 S.E. 625 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)