Cox v. Frost

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cox v. Frost

249 S.E.2d 695, 147 Ga. App. 429, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2709

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 5, 1978

Docket56270

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 249 S.E.2d 695 (Cox v. Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cox v. Frost, 249 S.E.2d 695, 147 Ga. App. 429, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2709 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

The plaintiff, movant for summary judgment, having introduced evidence showing that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that it was entitled to prevail on the undisputed facts, and the defendant having then rested on its pleadings without offering any evidence to suggest any remaining factual issue, the trial court’s grant of the motion for summary judgment was correct. E. g., McCracken v. Gainesville Tribune, 146 Ga. App. 274, 277 (246 SE2d 360) (1978).

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, Judge.

The plaintiff, movant for summary judgment, having introduced evidence showing that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that it was entitled to prevail on the undisputed facts, and the defendant having then rested on its pleadings without offering any evidence to suggest any remaining factual issue, the trial court’s grant of the motion for summary judgment was correct. E. g., McCracken v. Gainesville Tribune, 146 Ga. App. 274, 277 (246 SE2d 360) (1978).

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 S.E.2d 695, 147 Ga. App. 429, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-frost-gactapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack