Cox v. Frost
249 S.E.2d 695, 147 Ga. App. 429, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2709
Opinion
The plaintiff, movant for summary judgment, having introduced evidence showing that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that it was entitled to prevail on the undisputed facts, and the defendant having then rested on its pleadings without offering any evidence to suggest any remaining factual issue, the trial court’s grant of the motion for summary judgment was correct. E. g., McCracken v. Gainesville Tribune, 146 Ga. App. 274, 277 (246 SE2d 360) (1978).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cox v. Frost, 249 S.E.2d 695, 147 Ga. App. 429, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2709 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).
249 S.E.2d 695 (Cox v. Frost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Govindasamy v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
715 S.E.2d 737 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)
COMMERCIAL CREDIT EQUIPMENT CORPORATION v. Bates
285 S.E.2d 560 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Match Point, Ltd. v. Adams
252 S.E.2d 90 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)