Cox v. . Dove

Superior Court of North Carolina

Cox v. . Dove

1 N.C. 72

DecidedMarch 5, 1796

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 72 (Cox v. . Dove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cox v. . Dove, 1 N.C. 72 (N.C. Ct. App. 1796).

Pincite

Opinion

To prove the entry, a negro slave was called and offered to be sworn.

But the Court (WILLIAMS, J., saying he never heard such a thing, asked: HAYWOOD, J., tacente), refused to admit the witness, although the defendant was stated to be a negro. 2, 1777, 2, 42, 307.

The case of State v. George, ante, p. 62, was cited: but much argument was not offered by the plaintiff's counsel; there being other witnesses attending to prove the fact intended to have been proved by the slave. He having been offered only to come at the opinion of the judges. The plaintiff proved a trespass committed by cutting timber, and had a verdict.

NOTE. — Upon the first point, see State v. George, ante, 62, and 1 Rev. Stat., ch. 31, sec. 81. The law was later clearly settled that a slave is a competent witness against a free negro. *Page 77 IN EQUITY, NEW BERN, March Term, 1796.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To prove the entry, a negro slave was called and offered to be sworn.

But the Court (WILLIAMS, J., saying he never heard such a thing, asked: HAYWOOD, J., tacente), refused to admit the witness, although the defendant was stated to be a negro. 2, 1777, 2, 42, 307.

The case of State v. George, ante, p. 62, was cited: but much argument was not offered by the plaintiff's counsel; there being other witnesses attending to prove the fact intended to have been proved by the slave. He having been offered only to come at the opinion of the judges. The plaintiff proved a trespass committed by cutting timber, and had a verdict.

NOTE. — Upon the first point, see State v. George, ante, 62, and 1 Rev. Stat., ch. 31, sec. 81. The law was later clearly settled that a slave is a competent witness against a free negro. *Page 77 IN EQUITY, NEW BERN, March Term, 1796.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-dove-ncsuperct-1796.