Cox v. Dorsey
110 S.E. 236, 152 Ga. 532, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 209
This text of 110 S.E. 236 (Cox v. Dorsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cox v. Dorsey, 110 S.E. 236, 152 Ga. 532, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 209 (Ga. 1922).
Opinions
1. Under the facts stated in the question, the term “ accusation ” in the recognizance is broad enough to include the term “warrant.” See Cleveland v. Brown, 141 Ga. 829 (82 S. E. 243); Foole v. Gordon, 87 Ga. 277 (13 S E. 512).
2. Accordingly it should be presumed that the obligors in the bail-bond understood when they executed it that the term “ accusation ” therein referred to a “ warrant.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cox v. Dorsey
110 S.E. 742 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 236, 152 Ga. 532, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-dorsey-ga-1922.