Cox v. Dorsey
110 S.E. 236, 152 Ga. 532, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 209
Opinions
1. Under the facts stated in the question, the term “ accusation ” in the recognizance is broad enough to include the term “warrant.” See Cleveland v. Brown, 141 Ga. 829 (82 S. E. 243); Foole v. Gordon, 87 Ga. 277 (13 S E. 512).
2. Accordingly it should be presumed that the obligors in the bail-bond understood when they executed it that the term “ accusation ” therein referred to a “ warrant.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cox v. Dorsey, 110 S.E. 236, 152 Ga. 532, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 209 (Ga. 1922).
110 S.E. 236 (Cox v. Dorsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cox v. Dorsey
110 S.E. 742 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)