Cox v. Dorsey

110 S.E. 236, 152 Ga. 532, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 209
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 12, 1922·No. No. 2685·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Pee Curiam

1. Under the facts stated in the question, the term “ accusation ” in the recognizance is broad enough to include the term “warrant.” See Cleveland v. Brown, 141 Ga. 829 (82 S. E. 243); Foole v. Gordon, 87 Ga. 277 (13 S E. 512).

2. Accordingly it should be presumed that the obligors in the bail-bond understood when they executed it that the term “ accusation ” therein referred to a “ warrant.”

All the Justices concur, except

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. Dorsey, 110 S.E. 236, 152 Ga. 532, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 209 (Ga. 1922).

110 S.E. 236 (Cox v. Dorsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cox v. Dorsey
110 S.E. 742 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)