Cox v. Cox

Utah Supreme Court

Cox v. Cox

2015 UT 0

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 17, 2015

DocketCase No. 20150261

StatusPublished

This text of 2015 UT 0 (Cox v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cox v. Cox, 2015 UT 0 (Utah 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE FILED

UTAH APPELLATE COURTS F ATE F AH SUPREME COURTO THE ST 0 UT JUL 1 7 2015 FRED C. Cox, Petitioner, Z).

SPENCER]. COX, in his capacity as

Lieutenant Governor of the State of Utah, Respondent.

Case No. 20150261-SC

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a petition for extraordinary relief. The petition pertains to a contemplated referendum for the repeal of HB 454, entitled "Prison Development Amendments," enacted by the Utah Legislature during the 2015 General Session, which ended on March 12, 2015. The petition asserts that a group of sponsors prepared a referendum application and that they "attempted to submit their Application on March 27, 2015, but [were] refused and denied that opportunity by the Utah [Lieutenant] Governor's Election Office, based on the [five-day] deadline found in Utah Code, 20A-7—302." The Petitioner has not identified himself as one of the prospective sponsors, and the Court has determined he lacks standing to contest any action or inaction by the Lieutenant Governor with

respect to the prospective sponsors’ application. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

FOR THE COURT

Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE FILED

UTAH APPELLATE COURTS F ATE F AH SUPREME COURTO THE ST 0 UT JUL 1 7 2015 FRED C. Cox, Petitioner, Z).

SPENCER]. COX, in his capacity as

Lieutenant Governor of the State of Utah, Respondent.

Case No. 20150261-SC

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a petition for extraordinary relief. The petition pertains to a contemplated referendum for the repeal of HB 454, entitled "Prison Development Amendments," enacted by the Utah Legislature during the 2015 General Session, which ended on March 12, 2015. The petition asserts that a group of sponsors prepared a referendum application and that they "attempted to submit their Application on March 27, 2015, but [were] refused and denied that opportunity by the Utah [Lieutenant] Governor's Election Office, based on the [five-day] deadline found in Utah Code, 20A-7—302." The Petitioner has not identified himself as one of the prospective sponsors, and the Court has determined he lacks standing to contest any action or inaction by the Lieutenant Governor with

respect to the prospective sponsors’ application. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

FOR THE COURT

Chief Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2015 UT 0, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-cox-utah-2015.